Last Sunday was the third Sunday
in Advent, known within the church as Gaudete Sunday (rejoice Sunday).
In the chosen reading from Philippians chapter 4 (4-7), Paul writes, “Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, rejoice. Let your gentleness be known to everyone. The Lord is near. Do not worry about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be known to God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.”
But all this talk of rejoicing, and especially of rejoicing
always, may very well seem deeply insensitive to those for whom this season’s
joyful character jars so utterly with their own deep and searing pain. There
are countless families just like mine, for whom this Christmas is to be the
first without someone we have so deeply loved, which certainly adds a rather
sobering, quieting note to all this rejoicing lark!
IF you want to read a gripping exploration of grief, look no
further than C.S. Lewis’s ‘A Grief Observed,’ the publication of his notes
following the death of his beloved wife, the American writer Joy Davidman.
Lewis, in fact, published the work under a pseudonym and many of his friends
unknowingly recommended it to him as reading matter to help with his grief for
Joy.
In the book, Lewis is forced to confront in the real world
what he had theoretically worked out decades earlier in ‘The Problem of Pain.’
In that work, he had sought to reconcile the notion of a good god with a world
full of suffering. As usual, he had not settled easily upon any trivial,
comforting or immediately reassuring answers, but had noted how pain, being so
hard to ignore, may be the means by which we come to rely more fully and
completely on God. In pain and suffering, we are corrected, challenged, forced
to confront the reality of our limitations. Pain imposes upon us the necessity
of surrender. It is through pain that we are most changed and transformed.
Yet, in ‘A Grief Observed,’ he bridges the gap between a
philosophy and its application to life in the depths of his own misery. And one
thing is strikingly clear: it is not easy!
It is often suggested by religion’s detractors that it’s a
comfort blanket for the grim realities of life, and more pertinently, of death.
Yet Lewis experiences the opposite. If God is love, he is easier to buy into
when things are good. In his happy times with Joy, Lewis explains that he
“feasted on love,” and that the good times didn’t lessen his desire for God any
more than they lessened his desire for food or literature. He notes that one
can profess belief in anything until it has consequences and implications in
the real world.
It is in the separation from Joy that Lewis is spiritually
stripped to the bones. Where is God? Is he a “cosmic sadist?” If a good god has
done all this, is that not actually worse?
Lewis writes: “The terrible thing is that a perfectly good
god is in this matter hardly less formidable than a cosmic sadist. The more we
believe that God hurts only to heal, the less we believe that there is any use
in begging for tenderness. A cruel man might be bribed, might grow tired of his
vile sport, might have a temporary fit of mercy as alcoholics have fits of
sobriety. But suppose that what you are up against is a surgeon whose
intentions are wholly good: the kinder and more conscientious he is, the more
inexorably he will go on cutting.”
What is more, Lewis is appalled by common platitudes and
attempts to give easy answers, a mentality bitterly summed up as “There are
cigars in heaven.” In a famous passage, he writes, “Talk to me about the truth
of religion and I’ll listen gladly. Talk to me about the duty of religion and
I’ll listen submissively. But don’t come talking to me about the consolations
of religion or I shall suspect that you don’t understand.”
What, then, is Lewis’s path out of this despair? How does he
make his peace with God? The answer, ultimately, is the recognition that his
love for Joy has changed him. Bereavement, he concludes, is not “love cut
short” but is, in fact, another phase of a journey together, just as marriage
follows courtship. It is a continuation of the path they had set out upon
together. His mind is focussed not on the unimaginable nature of the eternal or
the transformation of his wife into a holy icon that is the product of his
projections, but appreciation for what has been and what it has meant.
For Lewis, then, gratitude is his redemption. It is that
which ultimately reconciles him to his Christian faith. He realises, in the
course of his reflections, that if we are to genuinely be comforted by the
Christian hope of eternal life, we must ultimately order our affections such as
to love God above all things. The dead cannot be returned to us. We cannot see,
touch or hear them as we used to, yet that is what we long for. Lewis concludes
that only by loving God and the dead above ourselves, can we break from that
desire and make our peace with their return to God, with their soul’s journey
to its eternal home.
And, finally, here’s where we get to the significance of the
Christmas story. How can we love that which we do not know? How can we love
God, if God is a set of intellectual abstractions and philosophical
propositions? How can we love God if God is so utterly beyond the realm of
human comprehension?
Yet Christianity, uniquely, claims that God took on human
form, to become a part of human suffering. Far from watching on with pitiless
indifference, the Christian god is one who will weep at the graveside of his
beloved friend Lazarus. When we weep, we must remember that God has wept real,
sincere and heartfelt tears too. What an awesome revelation of God’s love that
is!
The events of Christmas are celebrated each year with
rituals, music and traditions so utterly familiar to us, which carry on no
matter what, seemingly unconcerned by the dance of hope and tragedy that has marked
the passing year, and well they should, since the events of Christmas turn the
world on its head. They answer the question of whether we are here today and
gone tomorrow in a chaotic and purposeless universe, or whether there is an
eternal into which we can place our hope.
So back to rejoicing! The reading doesn’t invite us to
rejoice in a shallow way, to pretend to leave our troubles aside and fake it
until we make it. Instead, rejoicing is about living a life centred on hope in
God, who through the profound mystery of the Christmas story has made himself
known to us,, that he may occupy his rightful place in our hearts.
We may still feel deep sadness that those we love will not
have their seats at our festive tables, and share the delights of Christmas
with us as they did before. We must allow ourselves the right to acknowledge
that pain, to go through it and to comfort one another. But God lights our way
towards hope; God is our rudder as we sail into the storms of life. The
Christian story anchors our pain in hope. It absorbs our little stories into
one big story, in which love and hope reign triumphant.
“Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, rejoice.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Readers are trusted to keep it clean and respectful.
If you have difficulty posting anonymous comments, you may need to turn off settings preventing third-party cookies or cross-site tracking prevention.
If, like me, you have a visual impairment, you may need to select an audio challenge if the system requests verification. These are easy to hear.
If you still cannot post comments for any reason, please email aidanjameskiely1@gmail.com